Lead authors:

Whitney R. Lonsdale, Montana Water Center, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717

Wyatt F. Cross, Montana Water Center, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717

Contributing authors:

Charles E. Dalby, Kintla Enterprises, Helena, MT 59601

Sara E. Meloy, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Helena, MT 59601

Ann C. Schwend, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Helena, MT 59601

The Montana University System Water Center is part of a nationwide network of university-based Water Resources Research Institutes and is housed at Montana State University (www.montanawatercenter.org). The primary goals of the Water Center are to support water research and education, and to provide accurate and unbiased information on Montana’s most critical water issues. The Montana Water Center also serves as a connection point between the Montana University System and other water-focused entities and stakeholders in the stat

The National Institutes for Water Resources
Montana Institute on Ecosystems
NSF EPSCoR
Montana University System

Published November 2020

Please cite this publication as: Lonsdale, W. R., Cross, W. F., Dalby, C. E., Meloy, S. E., Schwend, A. C., 2020. Evaluating Irrigation Efficiency: Toward a Sustainable Water Future for Montana, Montana University System Water Center, Montana State University, 42p., doi.org/10.15788/mwc202011


Table of CONTENTS


KEY MESSAGES

WATER AND IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE

Building a collective understanding

Figure 1| The multidisciplinary nature of irrigated agriculture

Box 1 | Defining irrigation efficiency

IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE IN MONTANA

Irrigation and crop type

Irrigation methods and changes over time

Motivating factors for converting to sprinkler irrigation

Motivating factors for maintaining flood irrigation

Figure 2 | Statewide irrigation consumption by 8-digit hydrological unit

Figure 3 | Conversion to sprinkler irrigation in Montana

Figure 4 | Conversions from flood to sprinkler irrigation near Hamilton and Bozeman, Montana.

Table 1 | Top crops in Montana

Box 2 | Irrigation methods

THE PARADOX OF IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY

Table 2 | Potential outcomes of different irrigation and conveyance methods

HYDROLOGY OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE

Figure 5 | Pathways of water flow in irrigated agriculture

Box 3 | Irrigation hydrology

ASSESSING CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGING IRRIGATION METHODS

The importance of spatial scale

Irrigation influences the spatial and temporal availability of water

Site specificity

Figure 6 | Spatial scale influences calculations of irrigation efficiency

Figure 7 | Importance of flow regime to aquatic ecology

Figure 8 | Conceptual differences in flow regime as a result of irrigation management practices

Table 3 | Terminology

Box 4 | Streamflow and aquatic ecosystems

WATER POLICY AND IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE

Montana water policy basics

Water policy and changes in irrigation method

Case Study 1: U.S. Supreme Court decision for the Tongue River Basin (Montana v. Wyoming)

ADAPTING TO CHANGE

Montana’s changing climate

Goal 1: Watershed-scale Irrigation Management and Water Budgeting

Goal 2: Supporting Aquifer Recharge

Case Study 2: Aquifer recharge through the use of irrigation canals in the Beaverhead (MT) and Teton (ID) watersheds

Case Study 3: Gold Creek: Maintenance of diverse irrigation methods to optimize water supply in Gold Creek, MT

Goal 3: Water Conservation

Table 4 | Knowledge gaps

Box 5 | Montana’s changing climate

CONCLUSIONS

LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS

GLOSSARY

Banner photo by Wyatt Cross